1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,000
Yes, sir.

2
00:00:02,000 --> 00:00:05,000
Bob, get the thing here in the mail.

3
00:00:05,000 --> 00:00:06,000
Yes.

4
00:00:06,000 --> 00:00:08,000
The evening of November 14.

5
00:00:08,000 --> 00:00:09,000
Uh-huh.

6
00:00:09,000 --> 00:00:15,000
Bob, if I am reading the math correctly, there wasn't just one meter, but one, two, five.

7
00:00:15,000 --> 00:00:16,000
Five.

8
00:00:16,000 --> 00:00:17,000
Five.

9
00:00:17,000 --> 00:00:18,000
Five.

10
00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:19,000
Let me ask you about that on tape.

11
00:00:19,000 --> 00:00:20,000
That's phenomenal, so to speak.

12
00:00:20,000 --> 00:00:24,000
Okay, Bob Gribble, phenomenal research.

13
00:00:24,000 --> 00:00:32,000
Okay, we have been told by the authorities, the Baye, that there was a meteor that crashed.

14
00:00:32,000 --> 00:00:36,000
First few were told in Centrally, and then they started looking for it in eastern Washington.

15
00:00:36,000 --> 00:00:41,000
What do you think happened, and how credible was this, and how many objects were there really?

16
00:00:41,000 --> 00:00:43,000
Well, actually, there were five objects involved.

17
00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:48,000
Unfortunately, the one which was supposed to have impacted with the earth around McKenna,

18
00:00:48,000 --> 00:00:54,000
was the one that really dominated the activities at night, and this is the particular story

19
00:00:54,000 --> 00:00:56,000
that was picked up by the news media.

20
00:00:56,000 --> 00:01:03,000
We started getting reports at about 6.20 that evening, and the calls came in all night.

21
00:01:03,000 --> 00:01:10,000
Of course, we put together the pieces of this jigsaw puzzle, and came up with five different objects instead of the one.

22
00:01:10,000 --> 00:01:21,000
I think the reason that the scientific community was not aware of these others is the fact that they were just completely ignored by the news media,

23
00:01:21,000 --> 00:01:25,000
or possibly the news media did not know about them.

24
00:01:25,000 --> 00:01:30,000
Okay, now why would the scientific community get so hung up on this?

25
00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:38,000
Do you think the scientific community is a little too fast to write off a UFO setting?

26
00:01:38,000 --> 00:01:48,000
Well, oh yes, I think that the majority of the people associated with the scientific community will ignore any UFO report when it appears to be a media.

27
00:01:48,000 --> 00:01:55,000
And of course, they concentrated on that particular case because they wanted to get a hold of that media before a time lapse.

28
00:01:55,000 --> 00:02:05,000
And I think that they were lacking information, whereas on that particular evening, we were just getting reports from all over western Washington

29
00:02:05,000 --> 00:02:10,000
that there were different sections of eastern Washington, and they did not have this data available to them.

30
00:02:10,000 --> 00:02:21,000
Okay, now it's kind of a rare phenomenon if in fact there are these five objects, and it's kind of interesting that a lot of them appeared to break up and explode.

31
00:02:21,000 --> 00:02:23,000
Is that a normal behavior?

32
00:02:23,000 --> 00:02:26,000
Well, we don't know for a fact that they did explode.

33
00:02:26,000 --> 00:02:29,000
According to the witnesses, they did break up.

34
00:02:29,000 --> 00:02:35,000
Of course, when we get a description that an object has exploded, we immediately look for this clue.

35
00:02:35,000 --> 00:02:39,000
Was there any audible sound? Did they pick up sound waves?

36
00:02:39,000 --> 00:02:44,000
And of course, in none of these cases where they broke up, did sound waves occur,

37
00:02:44,000 --> 00:02:54,000
nor did the case in eastern Washington where it was supposed to have exploded in a very violent explosion, according to the witness, did they hear any sound waves?

38
00:02:54,000 --> 00:03:04,000
So, yes, it is common in the field of ufology where these objects will break up and not create any sound pattern at all.

39
00:03:04,000 --> 00:03:17,000
Have you had any speculation at all of what kind of an object would fly along visible for those, in case most of them over a hundred miles, and why would an object do that and then break up?

40
00:03:17,000 --> 00:03:27,000
Well, we feel that it could be some kind of a monitoring missile which is attempting to pick up some kind of data in the particular area where the breakup was reported.

41
00:03:27,000 --> 00:03:46,000
Or we are dealing with an electrical phenomenon of some kind in which the object itself actually does not break up but merely puts off electrical charges which make it appear that it has broke up.

42
00:03:46,000 --> 00:03:51,000
Outstanding, Bob. I'm still going to get ahold of you on one of these stations and we'll take a half hour of public affairs program.

43
00:03:51,000 --> 00:03:52,000
That would be great.

44
00:03:52,000 --> 00:03:53,000
Okay.

45
00:03:53,000 --> 00:03:54,000
Thanks, sir.

46
00:03:54,000 --> 00:03:55,000
Thank you.

47
00:03:55,000 --> 00:03:56,000
Bye-bye.